Comparison Between Subjective And Objective Assessment Of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy In Cancer Survivor: A Case Study

Authors

  • Nidhi Singh
  • Anchit Gugnani
  • Raju K Parasher
  • Prashant Mehta
  • Siddharth Shankar Sood

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S05.386

Keywords:

chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, tuning fork.

Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects 19-85% of individuals who have received neurotoxic chemotherapy.
CIPN is generally assessed subjectively using patient self-report or clinician-reported questionnaires. The goal of this study was to use
mTNS to objectively measure CIPN in patients, as well as to investigate the concordance between mTNS and subjective EORTC QLQ
– CIPN 20 assessment. Patients getting chemotherapy for cancer were recruited at the hospital for this case study. We measured CIPN
using subjective and objective methods, namely the EORTC QLQ – CIPN 20 and the modified total neuropathy score. The prevalence
of patients with abnormal sensation was observed on mTNS and EORTC QLQ – CIPN 20 grading. The level of concordance between
quantitative and subjective measures was poor. CIPN should be evaluated objectively as well as subjectively.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparison Between Subjective And Objective Assessment Of Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy In Cancer Survivor: A Case Study. (2022). Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13, 2503-2505. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S05.386