Comparative Evaluation Of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance Of Protaper NEXT And Reciproc R Rotary Files In Simulated Canals With Angle Of Curvatures At 45° And 60°: An Invitro Study

Authors

  • Shaik Mohd Sajid
  • Mohammad Abdur Rahman
  • Ooha B
  • Mohammad Abdur Rahim
  • Ain us Saba
  • Arati Hoskhande

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S05.218

Keywords:

Cyclic Fatigue Resistance, Reciproc R, Protaper Next, Nickel Titanium Instruments

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the cyclic fatigue resistance of Pro Taper NEXT & Reciproc R rotary files in simulated canals with angle of curvatures
at 45o and 60 o.
Materials and Methods; This study was conducted at HKE' s S.Nijalingappa institute of dental sciences and reasearch institute,
Kalaburagi. After considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria the selected samples were divided into two groups, as G1(ProTaper
NEXT) and G2(RECIPROC R), further these two groups are divide into 2 subgroups.
Results: The mean cyclic fatigue was significantly high in Reciproc R procedure as compared to ProTaper NEXT. Therefore Reciproc
R procedure was better as compared to ProTaper NEXT.
Conclusion: Cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc R was higher than the ProTaper NEXT.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-10

Issue

Vol. 13 SPECIAL ISSUE 05 (2022)

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Comparative Evaluation Of Cyclic Fatigue Resistance Of Protaper NEXT And Reciproc R Rotary Files In Simulated Canals With Angle Of Curvatures At 45° And 60°: An Invitro Study. (2022). Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13, 1400-1404. https://doi.org/10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S05.218