Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques: An original research

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the precision of Intraoral scanners (IOS) interocclusal registration with that of conventional methods with a silicone impression material and a gypsum cast.

Methodology: Eight participants with complete natural dentitions were enrolled. Images of their maxillary and mandibular quadrant arches and their interocclusal relationship were scanned with 2 IOSs: the 3M True Definition Scanner and the TRIOS Scanner 3. In the conventional method, impressions of complete-arch dentition and quadrant-arch dentition were made with a silicone impression material, and gypsum casts were fabricated, mounted on a dental articulator relatedwith a silicone interocclusal record, and scanned with a 3D laboratory scanner. These procedures were repeated 4 times, and 4 sets of interocclusal registration data in standard tessellation language (STL) format were generated for each condition. Interocclusal registration precision was evaluated by determining the discrepancy of the STL data between repeated measurements by using the best-fit-algorithm method.

Results: The average discrepancies for all participants were 25 ±12 mm for the True Definition, 31 ±7 mm for the TRIOS 3, 154 ±59 mm for the complete arch, and 128 ±33 mm for the quadrant arch. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that the effect of the impression methods on the discrepancy was statistically significant (P<.001). The Steel-Dwass test showed that both digital scan methods exhibited significantly smaller discrepancies than the 2 conventional methods (P=.005).

Conclusion: Intermaxillary relationship captured by the digital scan method by using IOSs had better precision than that obtained by the conventional method.